Which way for Oil?
The US presidential race has been much closer than anticipated and clearly there is now no ‘blue wave’ as all the polls were signalling. Nevertheless, challenger Biden is closing in on the magic 270 marker needed to take the win. While the forecast softness in the dollar from a Democratic presidency should be supportive for the broader commodities complex, for oil the shorter-term outlook may be bearish.
This comes primarily due to the rising chances that the Democrats adopt a less hawkish approach towards Iran. This could lead to the lifting of sanctions and a return of 1.5-2 million barrels per day of Iranian supply to the market over time. But a greener Biden presidency that discourages US oil and natural gas investment in the long term may set the stage for a timing issue and supply crunch, as renewables struggle to take over market share from fossil fuels. Increased regulation and a partial ban on fracking may also tighten supply over time.
For now, it is important to remember that President Trump has guided the US toward becoming a net exporter of oil of the first time in decades. And the fact that the Republicans potentially keep control of the Senate probably has more implications for the energy sector than the oil price, as fossil fuel producers have bounced back this week in favour of their clean energy counterparts which would have been boosted by a blue wave victory.
Black April…black winter?
More importantly, spiking Covid infections and subsequent lockdowns across the northern hemispheres are expected to severely weaken oil demand, as they did in April. The International Energy Agency dubbed the month ‘black April’ and of course a shortage of storage space for oil that consumers no longer wanted created financial panic, resulting in prices briefly falling into negative territory. That collapse in prices hit the US shale sector particularly hard, which had been pushing the US to record production highs before the pandemic.
The week at the end of October saw oil prices fall 10%, when many European countries announced new restrictive measures, with the hit to consumption forecast to be significant. Before the pandemic, the region’s demand was roughly a fifth of the global total, or 20 million b/d and analysts believe that level will fall to 17-18 million b/d this month, having been as low as 14 million b/d in April. OPEC itself has already forecast that global oil demand will fall 10% this year, but that does not include the forthcoming winter blow to demand.
If stricter measures remain in place through until Spring, then more revisions will need to take place and oil prices may push further south. Rising infection cases in the US may also have a knock-on effect on demand, even if many states do not yet face tighter lockdowns. That said, restrictions are less onerous than before with for example, schools remaining open.
OPEC+ to act on abundant supply?
On the other side of the price equation, it is clear that there is ample global supply which is not helping oil bulls support or push prices higher. US stockpiles are at their highest levels since July, the Libyan ceasefire has helped put its production back on line and some OEPC members appear determined to resume production growth from January.
All these pressures set up traders for an important OPEC+ meeting at the end of this month. It seems increasingly likely that production cuts will need to rolled over into the new year. Indeed, the catalyst for a recent move higher in prices came from Russia who were said to be discussing a three-month extension until the end of the first quarter next year. This is significant as Russia has traditionally been the stumbling block in agreeing to deepening output cuts.
Much will depend on the duration of the current lockdowns during winter and if new measures further crimp demand in the US. Brent appears to be rolling over again, having been capped this week by the 50-day Moving Average at $41.59. With a bearish channel from September of modestly lower highs and lower lows, prices may drift towards first support around $39, before a potential move to this month’s lows above $36.
Bei diesem Artikel handelt es sich um eine Werbemitteilung. Diese Information wurde von Pepperstone GmbH bereitgestellt. CFD sind komplexe Instrumente und beinhalten wegen der Hebelwirkung ein hohes Risiko, schnell Geld zu verlieren. 69,28% der Kleinanlegerkonten verlieren Geld beim CFD-Handel mit diesem Anbieter. Sie sollten überlegen, ob Sie verstehen, wie CFD funktionieren und ob Sie es sich leisten können, das hohe Risiko einzugehen, Ihr Geld zu verlieren. Zusätzlich zum untenstehenden Haftungsausschluss enthält das auf dieser Seite enthaltene Informationsmaterial weder eine Auflistung unserer Handelspreise noch ein Angebot oder eine Aufforderung zu einer Transaktion in ein Finanzinstrument. Pepperstone übernimmt keine Verantwortung für die Verwendung dieser Kommentare und die daraus resultierenden Folgen. Es wird keine Zusicherung oder Gewähr für die Richtigkeit oder Vollständigkeit dieser Informationen gegeben. Folglich trägt der Anleger alleinverantwortlich das Risiko für einzelne Anlageentscheidungen. Jede angebotene Studie berücksichtigt nicht das Investment spezifischer Ziele, die finanzielle Situation und die Bedürfnisse einer bestimmten Person, die sie empfangen kann. Sie wurde nicht in Übereinstimmung mit den gesetzlichen Vorschriften zur Erstellung von Finanzanalysen erstellt und gilt daher als Werbemitteilung im Sinne des Wertpapierhandelsgesetzes (WpHG).