差價合約(CFD)是複雜的工具,由於槓桿作用,存在快速虧損的高風險。81.4% 的散戶投資者在與該提供商進行差價合約交易時賬戶虧損。 您應該考慮自己是否了解差價合約的原理,以及是否有承受資金損失的高風險的能力。

FOMC

The Fed vs the markets - an epic battle for 2023

Chris Weston
首席分析師
2022年12月15日
Anyone trading the FOMC meeting will attest that the collective thoughts in the market have really had to think about the outcome of this meeting – when we look at the reversals playing out its almost like they considered what Powell et al have detailed but largely dismissed the hawkish tone.

The fact we see 58bp of cuts priced into rates markets for the 2H23 offer me that confidence - so while Jay Powell will bang a message of higher for longer, if the rates market truly bought what he was selling we’d have not seen increased rate cuts priced and rate cut expectations would have come in, perhaps closer to 40bp.

The economic projections were clearly hawkish – the USD was right to spike (equity lower) on what we saw. The November CPI print had clearly driven market expectations that the 2023 fed funds projection (or ‘dot’) would be closer to 4.9% than 5.1%, so 5.1% was a surprise to the market. What’s more, 17/19 Fed voters projected a fed funds rate above 5% by end-2023. The rates market, as I say, doesn’t share this view.

We can look at growth expectations and see the Fed is forecasting just 0.5% GDP in 2023, a level below consensus, and certainly doesn’t offer much cushion for a soft landing, especially with unemployment expected to push up 90bp to 4.6%.

We can look at the inflation forecasts and see core PCE for end-2023 revised 40bp higher to 3.5% - it’s not overly positive that their models see inflation so sticky despite a far higher funds rate and weaker labour market – we can also adjust the Fed’s fed fund projection for their projections for inflation and see a real fed fund rate of 1.6% - that is undeniably hawkish.

Powell’s presser was predictably hawkish – the Fed chair made a strong case for not prematurely celebrating the evolution in inflation, but did welcome the progress, albeit stipulating it will take “substantially more evidence to give confidence that inflation is on a sustained downwards path”.

He played down the degree of cuts that are being forecast in the dot plot for 2024, suggesting they wouldn’t ideally cut until they saw 2% inflation. However, the market wanted to hear what it wanted to hear, and they wanted to hear the Fed were open to taking the pace to 25bp increments – we loosely heard that, and the Fed is open to a further slower pace (25bp hikes) and “feeling our way” towards a sufficiently restrictive territory.

In essence, the market is still of the view that inflation heads towards target in 2023 – economics and falling inflation will deteriorate sufficiently that Powell will be forced to cut earlier than he is stipulating – the likely result in a potential standoff between the Fed and the markets is volatility and the market forcing attempting to force the Fed to share the same vision as it sees.

We look at pricing around the 1 Feb FOMC meeting and see 32bp of hikes priced for this meeting – so, a near 30% chance of a 50bp hike, but that depends on the data flow – US non-farm payrolls (7 Jan) and CPI (13 Jan) jump out as influencing that call, but a 25bp hike seems the more likely outcome.

Let’s not forget that so often the reaction in markets on the day of the FOMC meeting is different from what we see the following session – often when positioning has been triggered on the facts, and calmer heads prevail the reaction can change – the ECB, BoE and SNB meetings in the session ahead do make that view somewhat more troublesome, but at this juncture I see breakouts in USDCHF, EURUSD, GBPUSD, AUDUSD and XAGUSD – let's see if the trend remains a friend.

這裡提供的資料並未根據旨在促進投資研究獨立性的法律要求進行準備,因此被視為市場營銷溝通。儘管它不受任何在投資研究傳播之前交易的禁制,我們不會在向客戶提供資料之前尋求任何優勢。

Pepperstone不代表這裡提供的材料是準確、及時或完整的,因此不應依賴於此。這些資訊,無論來自第三方與否,不應被視為建議;或者買賣的提議;或者購買或出售任何證券、金融產品或工具的招攬;或參與任何特定的交易策略。它不考慮讀者的財務狀況或投資目標。我們建議閱讀此內容的讀者尋求自己的建議。未經Pepperstone的批准,不允許複製或重新分發此信息。