Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • 中文版
  • English
  • 交易方式

    概览

    定价

    交易账户

    Pro

    高净值客户

    好友推荐计划

    活跃交易者计划

    交易时间

    维护计划

  • 交易平台

    概述

    交易平台

    集成

    交易工具

  • 市场与产品

    概述

    外汇

    股票

    交易所交易基金

    指数

    大宗商品

    货币指数

    指数差价合约股息

    股票差价合约股息

    差价合约远期

  • 市场分析

    概述

    市场导航

    每日简报

    会见分析师

  • 学习交易

    概述

    交易指南

    网络研讨会

  • 合作伙伴

  • 关于我们

  • 帮助和支持

  • 中文版
  • English

分析

Monetary Policy

Macro Trader: March FOMC Is No Gamechanger

Michael Brown
Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
2024年3月21日
Share
There’s a decent case to be made that the March 2024 FOMC meeting was the most predictable in a couple of years, perhaps even verging on dull, at least judging by the lack of fresh information that Powell & Co. provided. This is something that we should probably all get used to, as a predictable pace of G10 policy normalisation from summer onwards will likely make policy announcements relatively tedious events going forward.

Yes, on the FOMC, folk will excite themselves about the modest upward revision to the inflation projections, and the subsequent marginally higher dots in 2025, 2026, and the longer-run fed funds rate estimate. Even if, as is well known at this point, the dots, beyond the current year, are notoriously unreliable in projecting the rate path, with even FOMC officials themselves discounting the utility of the dots as a forecasting tool.

But, overall, one must ask the question, has anything significantly shifted in terms of the FOMC outlook?

The answer there is, to be frank, a resounding no.

Will the Fed still cut this year? Yes, of course, with the dot plot median still pointing to 75bp of easing in 2024, and the nominal fed funds rate having to be reduced as inflation continues to recede, in order to avoid a mechanical – and undesirable – tightening in monetary policy late in the cycle, which would risk choking economic growth, and throwing into doubt the ‘soft landing’ that the economy currently looks set for.

Preview

Will the Fed still bring QT to an end this year? Yes; discussions over the appropriate balance sheet policy took place at this meeting, and should be elaborated upon in the minutes due in a few weeks. A QT taper at the June meeting, with the process to conclude by the end of the year, still seems reasonable.

Are the FOMC still flexible? Yes, with inflation heading back towards the 2% target, the Fed have earnt the right to bring the ‘put’ back to the table – if the labour market were to drastically weaken, growth roll-over, or a financial accident to occur, the Committee can and will ease policy if necessary, either via rate cuts, or via targeted liquidity injections to sectors that may be most adversely affected.

All this combined leaves markets, basically, where they were before the March statement/SEP/presser dropped. With the ‘Fed put’ back, alive, well, and even more flexible than it was before, market participants should continue to have confidence in increasing their risk exposure, knowing that policymakers once more ‘have their backs’.

Of course, that’s not to say that risks do not remain. Geopolitics is one; sticky inflation another; and, continued hot earnings growth another.

It is also not to say that a drawdown, or pullback, in equities is not impossible. The 50-day moving average in the S&P 500 sits around 5% below the index’s current level, and seems a logical level to hold in the event of any move lower.

Preview

It is, however, to say, that the path of least resistance should continue to lead higher for risk assets, with dips remaining relatively shallow. Although risk remains, the easier policy backdrop – not just from the FOMC, but also from G10 peers – should continue, to a significant degree, insulate stocks from the fluid geopolitical backdrop, and keep a lid on equity vol.

FX and rates vol, however, should continue to tick higher, particularly after the SNB became the first G10 central bank to cut this cycle, evidencing how easing cycles across G10 will take place at a differing pace, and to differing magnitudes, providing renewed policy divergence, and thereby trading opportunity, within the FX space.


Related articles

交易者洞察 - 宽容的美联储是多头的绿灯

交易者洞察 - 宽容的美联储是多头的绿灯

FOMC
FED
March 2024 FOMC Review: Continuing The Countdown To Confidence

March 2024 FOMC Review: Continuing The Countdown To Confidence

FOMC
USD
Monetary Policy

此处提供的材料并未按照旨在促进投资研究独立性的法律要求进行准备,因此被视为营销沟通。虽然它并不受到在投资研究传播之前进行交易的任何禁令,但我们不会在向客户提供信息之前谋求任何优势。

Pepperstone并不保证此处提供的材料准确、及时或完整,因此不应依赖于此。无论是来自第三方还是其他来源的信息,都不应被视为建议;或者购买或出售的要约;或是购买或出售任何证券、金融产品或工具的征求;或是参与任何特定交易策略。它并未考虑读者的财务状况或投资目标。我们建议此内容的读者寻求自己的建议。未经Pepperstone批准,不得复制或重新分发此信息。

其他网站.

  • The Trade Off
  • 合作伙伴
  • 组.
  • 职业生涯

交易方式

  • 定价
  • 交易账户
  • Pro
  • 高净值客户
  • 活跃交易者计划
  • 朋友推荐
  • 交易时间

平台

  • 交易平台
  • 交易工具

市场与符号

  • 外汇
  • 股票
  • 交易所交易基金
  • 指数
  • 大宗商品
  • 货币指数
  • 加密货币
  • 差价合约远期

分析

  • 市场导航
  • 每日简报
  • Pepperstone 激石脉搏
  • 会见分析师

学习交易

  • 交易指南
  • 视频
  • 在线讲座
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
1300 033 375
Level 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street
墨尔本, VIC 澳大利亚 3008
  • 法律文件
  • 隐私政策
  • 网站条款与条件
  • Cookie政策
  • 举报人政策

风险警告:差价合约(CFD)是复杂的工具,由于杠杆作用,存在快速亏损的高风险。 81.3% 的散户投资者在于该提供商进行差价合约交易时账户亏损。您应该考虑自己是否了解差价合约的工作原理,以及是否有承受资金损失的高风险的能力

风险警告:差价合约和外汇交易是有风险的。它不适合每个人,如果你是一个专业客户,你的损失可能大大超过你的初始投资。你并不拥有相关资产或对其拥有权利。过去的业绩并不代表未来的业绩,而且税法可能会改变。本网站上的信息是一般性的,没有考虑到你的个人目标、财务状况或需求。你应该通过审查我们的目标市场的确定文件来考虑你是否属于我们的目标市场,并阅读我们的PDS和其他法律文件,以确保你在做出任何交易决定之前充分了解风险。我们鼓励你在必要时寻求独立建议。

Pepperstone Group Limited位于澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本柯林斯街727号第一座16楼,邮编VIC 3008,并由澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(Australian Securities and Investments Commission)许可和监管。 本网站上的信息以及所提供的产品和服务均不得分发给任何国家或地区(如果其分发或使用违反当地法律或法规)的任何人。

© 2025 Pepperstone Group Limited | 澳大利亚公司注册号 (ACN) 147 055 703 | 澳大利亚金融服务牌照号(AFSL) 414530