Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • 繁体中文
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Português
  • لغة عربية
  • ไทย
  • 交易方式

    概覽

    定價

    交易帳戶

    Pro

    高淨值客戶

    活躍交易者計劃

    好友推薦

    交易時間

    保養時間表

  • 概覽

    概述

    交易平台

    集成

    交易工具

  • 市場與符號

    概述

    外匯

    股票

    ETF

    指數

    大宗商品

    貨幣指數

    指數差價合約股息

    股票差價合約股息

    差價合約遠期

  • 分析

    概述

    導航市場

    每日簡報

    會見分析師

  • 學習交易

    概述

    交易指南

    網路研討會

  • 合作夥伴

  • 關於我們

  • 幫助和支持

  • 繁体中文
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Português
  • لغة عربية
  • ไทย

分析

Monetary Policy

Macro Trader: March FOMC Is No Gamechanger

Michael Brown
Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
2024年3月21日
Share
There’s a decent case to be made that the March 2024 FOMC meeting was the most predictable in a couple of years, perhaps even verging on dull, at least judging by the lack of fresh information that Powell & Co. provided. This is something that we should probably all get used to, as a predictable pace of G10 policy normalisation from summer onwards will likely make policy announcements relatively tedious events going forward.

Yes, on the FOMC, folk will excite themselves about the modest upward revision to the inflation projections, and the subsequent marginally higher dots in 2025, 2026, and the longer-run fed funds rate estimate. Even if, as is well known at this point, the dots, beyond the current year, are notoriously unreliable in projecting the rate path, with even FOMC officials themselves discounting the utility of the dots as a forecasting tool.

But, overall, one must ask the question, has anything significantly shifted in terms of the FOMC outlook?

The answer there is, to be frank, a resounding no.

Will the Fed still cut this year? Yes, of course, with the dot plot median still pointing to 75bp of easing in 2024, and the nominal fed funds rate having to be reduced as inflation continues to recede, in order to avoid a mechanical – and undesirable – tightening in monetary policy late in the cycle, which would risk choking economic growth, and throwing into doubt the ‘soft landing’ that the economy currently looks set for.

Preview

Will the Fed still bring QT to an end this year? Yes; discussions over the appropriate balance sheet policy took place at this meeting, and should be elaborated upon in the minutes due in a few weeks. A QT taper at the June meeting, with the process to conclude by the end of the year, still seems reasonable.

Are the FOMC still flexible? Yes, with inflation heading back towards the 2% target, the Fed have earnt the right to bring the ‘put’ back to the table – if the labour market were to drastically weaken, growth roll-over, or a financial accident to occur, the Committee can and will ease policy if necessary, either via rate cuts, or via targeted liquidity injections to sectors that may be most adversely affected.

All this combined leaves markets, basically, where they were before the March statement/SEP/presser dropped. With the ‘Fed put’ back, alive, well, and even more flexible than it was before, market participants should continue to have confidence in increasing their risk exposure, knowing that policymakers once more ‘have their backs’.

Of course, that’s not to say that risks do not remain. Geopolitics is one; sticky inflation another; and, continued hot earnings growth another.

It is also not to say that a drawdown, or pullback, in equities is not impossible. The 50-day moving average in the S&P 500 sits around 5% below the index’s current level, and seems a logical level to hold in the event of any move lower.

Preview

It is, however, to say, that the path of least resistance should continue to lead higher for risk assets, with dips remaining relatively shallow. Although risk remains, the easier policy backdrop – not just from the FOMC, but also from G10 peers – should continue, to a significant degree, insulate stocks from the fluid geopolitical backdrop, and keep a lid on equity vol.

FX and rates vol, however, should continue to tick higher, particularly after the SNB became the first G10 central bank to cut this cycle, evidencing how easing cycles across G10 will take place at a differing pace, and to differing magnitudes, providing renewed policy divergence, and thereby trading opportunity, within the FX space.


Related articles

交易者洞察 - 寬容的聯準會是多頭的綠燈

交易者洞察 - 寬容的聯準會是多頭的綠燈

FOMC
FED
March 2024 FOMC Review: Continuing The Countdown To Confidence

March 2024 FOMC Review: Continuing The Countdown To Confidence

FOMC
USD
Monetary Policy
這裡提供的資料並未根據旨在促進投資研究獨立性的法律要求進行準備,因此被視為市場營銷溝通。儘管它不受任何在投資研究傳播之前交易的禁制,我們不會在向客戶提供資料之前尋求任何優勢。

Pepperstone不代表這裡提供的材料是準確、及時或完整的,因此不應依賴於此。這些資訊,無論來自第三方與否,不應被視為建議;或者買賣的提議;或者購買或出售任何證券、金融產品或工具的招攬;或參與任何特定的交易策略。它不考慮讀者的財務狀況或投資目標。我們建議閱讀此內容的讀者尋求自己的建議。未經Pepperstone的批准,不允許複製或重新分發此信息。

其他網站.

  • The Trade Off
  • 合作夥伴
  • 組.
  • 職業生涯

交易方式

  • 定價
  • 交易帳戶
  • Pro
  • 高淨值客戶
  • 活躍交易者計劃
  • 朋友推薦
  • 交易時間

平台

  • 交易平台
  • 交易工具

市場與符號

  • 外匯
  • 股票
  • ETF
  • 指數
  • 大宗商品
  • 貨幣指數
  • 加密貨幣
  • 差價合約遠期

分析

  • 導航市場
  • 每日簡報
  • Pepperstone脈衝
  • 會見分析師

學習交易

  • 交易指南
  • 影片
  • 網路研討會
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
+17866281209
#1 Pineapple House, Old Fort Bay, Nassau, New Providence, The Bahamas
  • 法律文件
  • 隱私政策
  • 網站條款與條件
  • Cookie政策

©2025 Pepperstone Markets Limited |版權所有。公司註冊號177174 B |SIA-F217

風險警告:差價合約(CFD)是複雜的工具,由於槓桿作用,存在快速虧損的高風險。 81% 的散戶投資者在與該提供商進行差價合約交易時賬戶虧損。 您應該考慮自己是否了解差價合約的原理,以及是否有承受資金損失的高風險的能力。

您不擁有標的的所有權或權力。過去的表現並不代表未來的表現,稅法也可能會發生變化。本網站上的信息本質上是一般性信息,沒有考慮您或您客戶的個人目標,財務狀況或需求。請在做任何交易決定之前閱讀我們的RDN和其他法律文件,並確保您完全了解風險。我們鼓勵您尋求獨立的建議。

Pepperstone Markets Limited位於 #1 Pineapple House, Old Fort Bay, Nassau, New Providence, The Bahamas,並由巴哈馬證券委員會(SIA-F217)許可並受其監管。

如果本網站上的信息以及所提供的產品和服務違反任何國家當地法律法規,本網站上的信息以及所提供的產品和服務均無意分發給這些國家或地區的任何人。