Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • 中文版
  • English
  • 交易方式

    概览

    定价

    交易账户

    Pro

    高净值客户

    好友推荐计划

    活跃交易者计划

    交易时间

    维护计划

  • 交易平台

    概述

    交易平台

    集成

    交易工具

  • 市场与产品

    概述

    外汇

    股票

    交易所交易基金

    指数

    大宗商品

    货币指数

    指数差价合约股息

    股票差价合约股息

    差价合约远期

  • 市场分析

    概述

    市场导航

    每日简报

    会见分析师

  • 学习交易

    概述

    交易指南

    网络研讨会

  • 合作伙伴

  • 关于我们

  • 帮助和支持

  • 中文版
  • English
  • 开启 Webtrader

  • 交易方式

  • 交易平台

  • 市场与产品

  • 市场分析

  • 学习交易

  • 合作伙伴

  • 关于我们

  • 帮助和支持

分析

GBP

February 2024 BoE Review: The Old Lady Takes Tentative Dovish Steps

Michael Brown
Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
2024年2月1日
Share
As anticipated, the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee left Bank Rate unchanged at a post-GFC high of 5.25% at the conclusion of the first policy decision of the year. However, the ‘Old Lady’ did make something of a dovish pivot, removing the implicit tightening bias from the statement, while formally noting that the policy discussion has now moved to “how long Bank Rate should be maintained at its current level”.

To the surprise of nobody at all, Bank Rate was kept on hold, for the 5th straight meeting, an outcome that OIS had fully discounted prior to the announcement. That said, the vote split among MPC members was more interesting, being the first 3-way split among MPC members since all the way back in 2008.

Preview

While the ‘core’ of the Committee – including Governor Bailey, and Chief Economist Pill – voted with 4 others to maintain Bank Rate, external MPC members Haskel and Mann stuck with their hawkish dissent from December, instead voting to increase Bank rate by 25bp. In contrast, external member Dhingra, who hadn’t voted for a hike since November 2022, dissented in a dovish direction, favouring a 25bp cut to 5.00%.

Along with the highly unusual 3-way vote split, which was marginally more dovish than markets had expected, the MPC also offered fresh policy guidance, altering wording that had previously been unchanged since the August 2023 decision.

While the MPC continue to see a need for policy to remain “restrictive for an extended period of time”, the policy statement omitted the previous reference to the Bank’s preparedness to tighten further if signs of persistent inflation were to emerge. This firmly implies, as if it wasn’t already clear, that the MPC’s tightening cycle is at an end, with the next move in Bank Rate to be a cut. To be frank, such a guidance shift was long overdue, and brings the Old Lady’s policy stance much more into line with their G10 peers.

As if to further emphasise this point, the statement noted that the Committee will now “keep under review” how long Bank Rate should remain at its current level. Clearly, the discussion on Threadneedle Street has now formally shifted from how high rates should rise, to the duration for which they should remain at current levels, and when the first Bank Rate cut should be delivered.

Money markets continue to price a relatively aggressive path of policy easing, despite a modest hawkish repricing over the decision, with the first 25bp rate cut still foreseen in June, in addition to pricing around 110bp of cuts over 2024 in its entirety.

Preview

It seems relatively clear that the MPC are unhappy with this dovish rate path.

The Bank’s latest economic forecasts, when based on the market rate path, point to this unhappiness, with headline CPI, when conditioned on OIS-implied rate expectations, set to remain north of the 2% target all the way through to Q4 2026. Given the MPC’s prior tendency to signal via inflation forecasts, this is an important and deliberate message, and represents relatively significant pushback on the rate path that markets currently price.

Preview

Governor Bailey picked up on this notion at the post-meeting press conference, noting the divergence between the market-based and constant-rate inflation forecasts, and stressing that the MPC’s focus is now to get the balance between the two correct, keeping policy sufficiently restrictive for sufficiently long, “nothing more, and nothing less”.

Bailey continued at the presser to outline the MPC’s current thinking, reiterating the message from the policy statement that policymakers will, at coming meetings, be mulling how much longer Bank Rate should remain at 5.25%, and whether price pressures have eased enough to enable the easing cycle to begin.

On this latter point, there is notable caution on the MPC about the inflation outlook, with Bailey himself noting that even if inflation were to return to target in the spring, that is not a case of “job done”, particularly with services inflation set to remain sticky, and upside risks having emerged amid rising geopolitical tensions.

With this in mind, it was perhaps no surprise that the Governor would not be drawn on the precise timing of any rate cut, noting that he will “not speculate” on the next meeting, or on what may occur at further meetings this year. This should be no surprise; no central bank that has adopted a “data-dependent” stance – be that the BoE, the ECB, the FOMC, or anyone else – can stick a date on when the appropriate data conditions for easing will be reached.

Amid all of this, the market reaction was relatively subdued. The GBP rallied a touch, around 40 pips, over the MPC decision, though this seemed largely an unwind of short bets that were placed in the run-up to the news hitting wires, with cable having slipped for much of the morning. Front-end gilts, meanwhile, found some modest sellers, with 2s rising around 7bp on a yield basis, while remaining well within yesterday’s ranges.

For cable, in particular, the story hasn’t particularly changed, with the broad 1.26 – 1.28 range remaining intact, and risks continuing to point to the downside as the ‘goldilocks’ US macro narrative continues to point towards a ‘soft landing’.

Preview

Overall, then, the February MPC meeting represented what many would consider an overdue dovish step from the Committee, with a formal acknowledgement that the next move in rates will be a cut. Nevertheless, in keeping with the theme of other G10 central banks, the ‘Old Lady’ will want to see further data to reassure policymakers that inflation is on its way back to target before firing the starting gun on the eventual easing cycle. Once again, it appears that markets will get the cuts they seek, just not as fast, or to as great a degree, as currently priced.

此处提供的材料并未按照旨在促进投资研究独立性的法律要求进行准备,因此被视为营销沟通。虽然它并不受到在投资研究传播之前进行交易的任何禁令,但我们不会在向客户提供信息之前谋求任何优势。

Pepperstone并不保证此处提供的材料准确、及时或完整,因此不应依赖于此。无论是来自第三方还是其他来源的信息,都不应被视为建议;或者购买或出售的要约;或是购买或出售任何证券、金融产品或工具的征求;或是参与任何特定交易策略。它并未考虑读者的财务状况或投资目标。我们建议此内容的读者寻求自己的建议。未经Pepperstone批准,不得复制或重新分发此信息。

其他网站.

  • The Trade Off
  • 合作伙伴
  • 组.
  • 职业生涯

交易方式

  • 定价
  • 交易账户
  • Pro
  • 高净值客户
  • 活跃交易者计划
  • 朋友推荐
  • 交易时间

平台

  • 交易平台
  • 交易工具

市场与符号

  • 外汇
  • 股票
  • 交易所交易基金
  • 指数
  • 大宗商品
  • 货币指数
  • 加密货币
  • 差价合约远期

分析

  • 市场导航
  • 每日简报
  • Pepperstone 激石脉搏
  • 会见分析师

学习交易

  • 交易指南
  • 视频
  • 在线讲座
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
1300 033 375
Level 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street
墨尔本, VIC 澳大利亚 3008
  • 法律文件
  • 隐私政策
  • 网站条款与条件
  • Cookie政策
  • 举报人政策

风险警告:差价合约(CFD)是复杂的工具,由于杠杆作用,存在快速亏损的高风险。 81.3% 的散户投资者在于该提供商进行差价合约交易时账户亏损。您应该考虑自己是否了解差价合约的工作原理,以及是否有承受资金损失的高风险的能力

风险警告:差价合约和外汇交易是有风险的。它不适合每个人,如果你是一个专业客户,你的损失可能大大超过你的初始投资。你并不拥有相关资产或对其拥有权利。过去的业绩并不代表未来的业绩,而且税法可能会改变。本网站上的信息是一般性的,没有考虑到你的个人目标、财务状况或需求。你应该通过审查我们的目标市场的确定文件来考虑你是否属于我们的目标市场,并阅读我们的PDS和其他法律文件,以确保你在做出任何交易决定之前充分了解风险。我们鼓励你在必要时寻求独立建议。

Pepperstone Group Limited位于澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本柯林斯街727号第一座16楼,邮编VIC 3008,并由澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(Australian Securities and Investments Commission)许可和监管。 本网站上的信息以及所提供的产品和服务均不得分发给任何国家或地区(如果其分发或使用违反当地法律或法规)的任何人。

© 2025 Pepperstone Group Limited | 澳大利亚公司注册号 (ACN) 147 055 703 | 澳大利亚金融服务牌照号(AFSL) 414530