CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 81.4% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Daily Fix: Traders unwinding G20 hedges, but can the goodwill last?

Chris Weston
Head of Research
Jul 1, 2019
Throughout most of last week, we focused on the risk that the G20 Summit held a gapping risk, knowing that the bar was low for a positive surprise. Now, while the bulk of what we’ve seen was in line with expectations and aligned with what was reported in the Chinese press last week, risk assets have warmed to what they’ve heard, and traders are clearly unwinding their G20 hedges today.
NAS100 daily

Looking around the markets, we can see the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures are up 0.9% and 1.2%, respectively. Asian equity markets are firmer, notably in China, which is over 2%. In FX land, USDCNH (offshore yuan) is 0.3% lower, although it’s come firmly off its earlier low and perhaps reacting to the contraction in the Caixin and NBS manufacturing report. USDJPY has followed S&P 500 futures higher and is tracking at 108.24.

Interestingly, AUDUSD is a touch lower on the day, as is EURUSD, resulting in the USDX up smalls. The NOK is the best performer in G10 FX, largely as a result of a strong move in crude on the open, while the TRY is finding buyers as volatility sellers encourage carry to outperform.

G20 review

In my mind, there are too many questions that remain, and there’s been no real progress on the key sticking points to feel this is in any way a game-changer at this stage. Certainly, the US and Chinese corporate sector, or the Federal Reserve, will haven’t heard anything that gives them real confidence that the G20 Summit changes the script. However, the highlights that spring out:

Trade truce: There’ll be no new tariffs for now on the remaining US$300bil of Chinese exports (to the US).

• Trade truce: A commitment to resume talks that recently fell apart, but when do these formally start?

• Political landmine: The US will loosen restrictions on US tech company sales to Huawei and the wider China tech space. There’s a credibility angle here, and we’ve already seen huge condemnation from cross-parties, from the likes of Chuck Schumer and Marco Rubio.

• In return, the Chinese will commit to buying increased amounts of agricultural products from US farmers.

• Improved visa treatment for Chinese students in the US.

We’re most focused on the schedule and future meetings between the two respective trade teams, in the search for real substance and the leaders to agree. Like many, I’m cautious, as it feels these policies are cosmetic and designed to keep financial markets in check. We’re watching domestic pushback, notably on the political fallout from Donald Trump’s easing of pressure on Huawei. It’s already been met by angry protests from the Democrats (specifically Chuck Schumer) and on Trump’s Republican side, namely Marco Rubio, who’s threatening to put the restrictions (on Huawei) back to Congress.

Fed speakers to watch

The question we need to ask is whether these outcomes give the Federal Reserve any clarity, and I’d argue not really. It’ll, therefore, be interesting to hear the thoughts direct from the source, with Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida due to speak shortly at 16:10 AEST, and then New York Fed President John Williams speaks tomorrow at 20:35 AEST. It feels too early to believe the G20 fully removes the threat of a 50bp cut, especially when we get the US ISM manufacturing (00:00 AEST) and non-farm payrolls (Friday at 22:30 AEST) this week. So, expect the USD, gold and equities to be sensitive to this narrative.

We can also add the fact that we’ve heard agreement between Russia and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to extend the production output curbs into 2020. We’re currently seeing Brent and WTI crude gaining 2% apiece.

I focus on the Fed here, but consider tomorrow’s Reserve Bank of Australia meeting (14:30 AEST), as this is a genuine risk event for traders holding an AUD or AUS200 exposure over the announcement. The AUDUSD setup looks constructive, although the risk of a failed break above the neckline of the double-bottom is increasing. As far as the playbook and key considerations that I feel should be assessed, it feels as though the AUD upside should be greater than that of any downside move. Although the case for a cut or for rates to be held for this month is finely balanced, and I wouldn’t like to be too exposed to this meeting.

AUD playbook:

• Looking at Aussie cash rate futures pricing, a cut tomorrow is priced at 69%. We can make a strong case for the RBA to cut or hold. But this pricing suggests we could get a decent spike higher or lower at 14:30 AEST, and it poses a risk to traders holding AUD exposures over the announcement.

• AUDUSD overnight implied volatility sits at 13.03%%, residing at its 57th percentile. But the period in May masks the reality of its current elevation. Through options pricing, we can see this equates to a 42-pip move (with a 68% degree of confidence) in either direction, with the one standard deviation range at 0.7042 to 0.6958. I’ve charted this, as well as increased the level of confidence to 80% of how far price may move (from spot) and see price contained in a 0.6930 to 0.7066 range.

• Eighteen of 26 economists are calling for the cut, with all of the Big Four forecasting easing.

• A quick glance at the weekly futures trader’s report (CFTC data), and we can see “non-commercial” traders (predominantly those who use FX futures to speculate) hold a net short position of 66,320 contracts.

The bottom line is, this is a genuine risk event for traders. Some love this backdrop and will trade around the announcement. Others will see the implied volume and binary nature of the event risk and reduce exposures — but this is the crux of event risk management.

The material provided here has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Whilst it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research we will not seek to take any advantage before providing it to our clients.

Pepperstone doesn’t represent that the material provided here is accurate, current or complete, and therefore shouldn’t be relied upon as such. The information, whether from a third party or not, isn’t to be considered as a recommendation; or an offer to buy or sell; or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, financial product or instrument; or to participate in any particular trading strategy. It does not take into account readers’ financial situation or investment objectives. We advise any readers of this content to seek their own advice. Without the approval of Pepperstone, reproduction or redistribution of this information isn’t permitted.