Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • English (UK)
  • Ways to trade

    Pricing

    Trading accounts

    Trading hours

    24-hour trading

    Spread betting vs CFDs

    Maintenance

  • Trading platforms

    Trading platforms

    TradingView

    MetaTrader 5

    MetaTrader 4

    Pepperstone platform

    cTrader

    Trading integrations

    Trading tools

  • Markets

    Markets to trade

    Forex

    Shares

    Indices

    Commodities

    Currency Indices

    Dividends for Index CFDs

    Dividends for Share CFDs

    CFD Forwards

    ETFs

  • Market analysis

    Market news

    Navigating Markets

    The Daily Fix

    Meet the Analysts

  • Learn to trade

    Trading guides

    CFD trading

    Spread betting

    Forex trading

    Commodity trading

    Stock trading

    Technical analysis`

    Day trading

    Scalping trading

    Candlestick patterns

    Upcoming IPOs

    Gold trading

    Oil trading

    Webinars

  • Partners

  • About us

  • Help and support

  • Professional

  • English (UK)
US

The Daily Fix: The real divergence in financial markets

Chris Weston
Chris Weston
Head of Research
8 Jul 2020
Share
One of the core conversations had on trading floors and that I’ve been having with clients remains around the divergence seen between risk assets and traditional fundamentals – that being, economics and valuation.

I always argue that financial markets, specifically equity and credit, are more a derivative of other factors, such as central bank liquidity, and flow from systematic players. Such as momentum and trend-following hedge funds (CTA’s for example). The introduction of retail traders, certainly in the support of US high growth equity names is also a key factor and while many dismiss these players, one just has to look at the average daily trades on platforms such as Robinhood, E-trade and TD Ameritrade; just incredible.

US Treasuries vs risk assets

One dynamic that is clear when we think of true disconnects is the message seen in risk and cyclical assets versus that of the US bond market.

If we start by look at positioning in US Treasury (TY) futures, we see leveraged funds (top pane - white) running a net short by 503k contracts – these speculative players are betting on higher yields, although, as we see, this position has come well off the lows seen in August, where we saw 1.16m net short Treasury futures contracts. One suspects these traders are using weakness (high yields) to reduce their short position of late and this is keeping yields suppressed.

Asset managers (blue - pension and mutual funds for example) are long 511k TY futures and are therefore expecting lower yields, although funds have been reducing this extended long position. So leveraged funds are reducing a monster short, while buy-side funds are reducing a sizeable long Treasury futures exposure.

08_07_2020_W1.png

Source: Bloomberg

Certainly, the short TY trade would be hurting given the moves lower in yields of late, especially in 5yr Treasuries, where literally any sell-off (i.e. higher yields) has been pounced upon. It feels like the hedge fund short has further legs here and that should keep yields low.

08_07_2020_W2.png

Source: Bloomberg

Also, consider that US Treasuries are not just an income vehicle or a play on anticipated central bank action, but they have a strong function in corporate cash management. Where companies can pledge US bonds as collateral for repo - that being, getting access to short-term capital from banks to fund their business operations.

The Fed to do more?

We also know there is a liquidity argument that keeps yields from rising, and most funds understand that any protracted sell-off (higher yields) would just increase the probability that the Fed adopt yield curve control, similar to what the RBA is doing - fixing part of the curve at a specific level by buying unlimited amounts of bonds in the secondary markets.

So, there are some interesting dynamics brewing in both moves in price action, and positioning in bonds. However, deep down giving a worrying message on the outlook of the US and global economy and never really bought into the rebound seen in the economic data flow. Certainly, when we look at traditional correlations between bonds and other variables, we ask is one right and the other wrong, and if so, how does it reconcile itself. This is the real disconnect which should be discussed.

Let us compare the US 10-yr Treasury to a few variables which typically have a solid relationship:

On the data side, we see the US 10’s (blue) vs the new orders sub-component of the US ISM manufacturing report.

08_07_2020_W3.png

Source: Bloomberg

On the financial markets side - US 10s vs the S&P500 cyclical/defensive sector ratio. Cyclical stocks have pushed higher of late, but bonds are not buying whatever equities are seeing.

08_07_2020_W4.png

Source: Bloomberg

US 10s (blue) vs the copper/gold ratio – We have seen copper outperforming gold, which is generally a sign of economic improvement and higher inflation expectations. Is it time that we see gold outperform?

08_07_2020_W5.png

Source: Bloomberg

US 10s vs 5th-month WTI crude future – I look at the fifth month WTI futures contract as it looks more closely at the idea of demand at the turn of the year. Whilst supply cuts have been a factor, typically, we see the 5th month WTI future and USTs sharing a strong relationship. That has broken down.

08_07_2020_W6.png

Source: Bloomberg

So, when we consider divergence, we really need to consider the disagreement between the message portrayed between bonds and cyclical assets – how this rectifies itself will make fascinating viewing as clearly the bond market is seeing the future in a less positive light.


Related articles

NAS100: Will the record highs ever end?

NAS100: Will the record highs ever end?

US
The Daily Fix: A bull in a China shop

The Daily Fix: A bull in a China shop

CN50
CNH

Most read

1

The disinflationary message seen in commodities and rates markets

2

Will the BOJ be the last dovish domino to fall?

3

Trader thoughts - the conflicting forces dictating EURUSD flow

Ready to trade?

It's quick and easy to get started. Apply in minutes with our simple application process.

Get startedSubscribe to The Daily Fix

The material provided here has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Whilst it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research we will not seek to take any advantage before providing it to our clients.

Pepperstone doesn’t represent that the material provided here is accurate, current or complete, and therefore shouldn’t be relied upon as such. The information, whether from a third party or not, isn’t to be considered as a recommendation; or an offer to buy or sell; or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, financial product or instrument; or to participate in any particular trading strategy. It does not take into account readers’ financial situation or investment objectives. We advise any readers of this content to seek their own advice. Without the approval of Pepperstone, reproduction or redistribution of this information isn’t permitted.

Other Sites

  • The Trade Off
  • Partners
  • Group
  • Careers

Ways to trade

  • Pricing
  • Trading accounts
  • Pro
  • Trading hours

Platforms

  • Trading Platforms
  • Trading tools

Markets and Symbols

  • Forex
  • Shares
  • ETFs
  • Indicies
  • Commodities
  • Currency indicies
  • CFD forwards

Analysis

  • Navigating Markets
  • The Daily Fix
  • Pepperstone pulse
  • Meet Our Analysts

Learn-to-trade

  • Trading guides
  • Videos
  • Webinars
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
+442038074724
70 Gracechurch St
London EC3V 0HR
United Kingdom
  • Legal documents
  • Privacy policy
  • Website terms and conditions
  • Cookie policy

© 2025 Pepperstone Limited 
Company Number 08965105 | Financial Conduct Authority Firm Registration Number 684312

Risk warning: Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74.8% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Trading derivatives is risky. It isn't suitable for everyone and, in the case of Professional clients, you could lose substantially more than your initial investment. You don't own or have rights in the underlying assets. Past performance is no indication of future performance and tax laws are subject to change. The information on this website is general in nature and doesn't take into account your or your client's personal objectives, financial circumstances, or needs. Please read our legal documents and ensure you fully understand the risks before you make any trading decisions. We encourage you to seek independent advice.

Pepperstone Limited is a limited company registered in England & Wales under Company Number 08965105 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Registration Number 684312). Registered office: 70 Gracechurch Street, London EC3V 0HR, United Kingdom.

The information on this site is not intended for residents of Belgium or the United States, or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.