差價合約(CFD)是複雜的工具,由於槓桿作用,存在快速虧損的高風險。81.4% 的散戶投資者在與該提供商進行差價合約交易時賬戶虧損。 您應該考慮自己是否了解差價合約的原理,以及是否有承受資金損失的高風險的能力。

Volatility

Is Vol Too Low, Or Priced To Perfection?

Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
2024年2月8日
While the macro narrative continues to evolve, and the hawkish repricing in the rates space has attracted plenty of attention, a degree of calm has fallen over financial markets, particularly judging by the recent decline in implied volatility gauges. It seems rational, then, to ask whether such a subdued level of vol is somewhat justified, or whether signs may be emerging that markets have become a little complacent.

Before discussing that, a look at various gauges of implied vol is probably worthwhile, see chart. As is relatively obvious, cross-asset vol has continued to decline since the turn of the year, particularly in the commodities space, while the VIX remains close to post-covid lows, and BofA’s MOVE index is planted at the bottom of the range that has been in place since the FOMC began their tightening cycle in early-2022.

Preview

A similar trend is in evidence in the FX space, with JPMorgan’s proprietary gauge of global FX volatility, covering 27 DM & EM USD pairs, having recently slipped to its lowest level since the fourth quarter of 2023. Anecdotally, as most G10 FX traders can probably attest to, the DM FX space has been particularly subdued of late, and at times akin to watching paint dry.

This lack of movement, and subsequent lack of discounting any fresh risks facing the market, begs the question as to whether markets are ‘priced to perfection’, or whether there are potential tail risks (both left & right) that have not yet been adequately priced.

On the one hand, and the camp that I tend to subscribe to at the moment, is the idea that the drop-off in, and continued low levels of, vol is justified. The most obvious rationale for this is that, across developed markets, ‘immaculate disinflation’ appears poised to continue, with headline price gauges set to return steadily towards 2% as the year progresses, and the US economy – in particular – on track for a ‘soft landing’.

While downside growth risks are more prevalent elsewhere, most notably in the eurozone, and of course in China, this backdrop does mean that the global monetary policy outlook, at presents, points to most DM central banks embarking on relatively synchronised, and steady, easing cycles, with money markets fully pricing the first Fed and ECB cuts for June, and the first 25bp cut from the BoE in July. There is a similar degree of commonality around the degree of total easing that markets price by the end of the year.

Preview

There is also, of course, the relatively barren spell that markets are currently passing through in terms of major data catalysts. After the blowout January NFP print, there is little of any particular interest on the calendar until next Tuesday’s CPI report; after that, we then look toward earnings from NVDA – the darling of the ‘magnificent seven’ – on 21st February, before focus then turns to the PCE report a the end of the month.

All that said, the economic outlook portrayed above is conditioned on a number of assumptions, chief among which being that the continued lagged effects of the tightening cycle don’t bear down more heavily on economic activity, and that the ‘last mile’ of returning inflation to target proceeds as smoothly as the journey has done thus far. Sticky services prices seem the greatest risk here.

Preview

There are, of course, numerous additional risks in the longer-run that markets must remain cognisant of, though which we are probably too far away from at present to be tradeable themes.

Elections in the UK and US, along with 38 other democracies across the globe, are likely to play an increasing role in influencing traders’ psyche as the year progresses, particularly in terms of any fiscal promises – most likely increased spending/lower taxes – that the campaigns for each are likely to bring. It will be of particular interest to see how market participants weigh up a loosening of monetary and fiscal policy at the same time, and how any additional liquidity may provide a tailwind for risk.

Geopolitical developments of course also remain front and centre, with tensions remaining elevated in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Taiwan, the latter being of particular importance given that competing with China, and ensuring fairer trade, is one of few issues that unites figures on both sides of the political aisle in DC.

Preview

In any case, these are longer-run catalysts. For now, it would appear that the ‘path of least resistance’ will continue to lead higher for equities (particularly on Wall St), and to the upside for the USD, though equity upside is likely to be more broad-based across sectors than seen last year. Low vol, then, seems justified, for now.

此處提供的材料並未按照旨在促進投資研究獨立性的法律要求準備,因此被視為市場溝通之用途。雖然在傳播投資研究之前不受任何禁止交易的限製,但我們不會在將其提供給我們的客戶之前尋求利用任何優勢。

Pepperstone 並不表示此處提供的材料是準確、最新或完整的,因此不應依賴於此。該信息,無論是否來自第三方,都不應被視為推薦;或買賣要約;或征求購買或出售任何證券、金融產品或工具的要約;或參與任何特定的交易策略。它沒有考慮讀者的財務狀況或投資目標。我們建議此內容的任何讀者尋求自己的建議。未經 Pepperstone 批準,不得復製或重新分發此信息。