Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • English
  • 中文版
  • Ways to trade

    Pricing

    Trading accounts

    Pro

    Premium clients

    Refer a friend

    Active trader program

    Trading hours

    24-hour trading

    Maintenance schedule

  • Trading platforms

    Trading platforms

    TradingView

    Pepperstone platform

    MetaTrader 5

    MetaTrader 4

    cTrader

    Integrations

    Trading tools

  • Markets

    Markets to trade

    Forex

    Shares

    ETFs

    Indices

    Commodities

    Currency Indices

    Cryptocurrencies

    Dividends for index CFDs

    Dividends for share CFDs

    CFD forwards

  • Market analysis

    Market news

    Navigating Markets

    The Daily Fix

    Meet the analysts

  • Learn to trade

    Trading guides

    CFD trading

    Forex trading

    Commodity trading

    Stock trading

    Crypto trading

    Bitcoin trading

    Technical analysis

    Candlestick patterns

    Day trading

    Scalping trading

    Upcoming IPOs

    Gold trading

    Oil trading

    Webinars

  • Pepperstone Pro

  • Partners

  • About us

  • Help and support

  • English
  • 中文版

Analysis

FOMC
Monetary Policy

The Fed’s QT Plans Raise More Questions Than Answers

Michael Brown
Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
25 Mar 2025
Share
The FOMC’s decision to slow the pace of balance sheet run-off has, perhaps counter-intuitively, raised the degree of uncertainty around the monetary outlook, seemingly not acting as the ‘put’ many had hoped for.

For all intents and purposes, QT is dead and buried.

Yes, the size of the Fed’s Treasury holdings will continue to shrink for some time to come, but at a rate of just $5bln per month, the pace of this will be more glacial than breakneck, especially when at one stage the Fed were letting as much as $60bln in Treasuries roll off the balance sheet every month.

Preview

That meagre pace, though, is important, from an ‘optics’ perspective if nothing else.

Firstly, it allows the Committee to maintain the narrative that balance sheet normalisation is continuing, even if in practice the rate of said normalisation is so slow as to barely be noticeable.

Secondly, maintaining such a modest pace of run-off prevents the Fed from becoming a net buyer of Treasuries, in turn avoiding a potential ‘sticky wicket’ whereby Powell & Co would have to explain why they’ve stepped back into the market, particularly at a time of notable upside inflation risk.

On that note, the framing of QT remains interesting, as policymakers seek to stress it being a ‘technical’ process, and not an explicit monetary policy measure. This seems like the FOMC trying to have their cake and eat it – you can’t claim that expanding the balance sheet provides stimulus, but that shrinking the balance sheet doesn’t tighten conditions. Hence, at the margin, the slowing of QT should at least moderate the pace at which financial conditions have recently been tightening.

Despite that, with the Fed remaining a net seller of Treasury holdings, the liquidity drain caused by balance sheet run-off looks set to continue, only at a slower pace. This isn’t, then, the ‘balance sheet put’ that I’d previously theorised, with J-Pow not riding to the rescue quite yet.

Instead, it is conceivable that the FOMC’s decision to slow the pace of balance sheet run-off may actually end up increasing policy-related uncertainty. Market participants will now be questioning a number of things – When QT will actually come to an end? Could the pace of QT be increased? What might policymakers do with MBS holdings?

Furthermore, given that the slowdown in balance sheet run-off was seemingly driven by concerns over the level of bank reserves sloshing around the US financial system, there are also questions to be asked over what constitutes an “ample” level, and at what point said reserves might become “scarce”. Again, this introduces a greater degree of uncertainty, not only as to that level, but also considering what the policy response might look like if, or indeed when, we dip below that “ample” threshold.

Preview

Putting all this together, it seems clear that, despite Chair Powell trying to brush the issue under the carpet a bit, and claim that the adjustments in question are all merely technical in nature, the QT tweak delivered last week could well prove to be bad news for risk assets.

Quite apart from being the backstop for sentiment that some, including I, had been hoping for when QT came to a close, the way in which the FOMC have handled things seems to have ended up raising more questions than answers.

For a market already being battered by a barrage of uncertainty from the Oval Office, a lack of clarity from the Eccles Building seems unlikely to do participants any favours.

The material provided here has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Whilst it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research we will not seek to take any advantage before providing it to our clients.

Pepperstone doesn’t represent that the material provided here is accurate, current or complete, and therefore shouldn’t be relied upon as such. The information, whether from a third party or not, isn’t to be considered as a recommendation; or an offer to buy or sell; or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, financial product or instrument; or to participate in any particular trading strategy. It does not take into account readers’ financial situation or investment objectives. We advise any readers of this content to seek their own advice. Without the approval of Pepperstone, reproduction or redistribution of this information isn’t permitted.

Other sites

  • The Trade Off
  • Partners
  • Group
  • Careers

Ways to trade

  • Pricing
  • Trading accounts
  • Pro
  • Premium Clients
  • Active Trader program
  • Refer a friend
  • Trading hours

Platforms

  • Trading Platforms
  • Trading tools

Markets & Symbols

  • Forex
  • Shares
  • ETFs
  • Indices
  • Commodities
  • Currency indices
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • CFD Forwards

Analysis

  • Navigating Markets
  • The Daily Fix
  • Pepperstone Pulse
  • Meet the analysts

Learn to Trade

  • Trading Guides
  • Videos
  • Webinars
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
1300 033 375
Level 16, Tower One, 727 Colins Street
Melbourne, VIC Australia 3008
  • Legal documents
  • Privacy policy
  • Website terms and conditions
  • Cookie policy
  • Whistleblower Policy

© 2025 Pepperstone Group Limited

Risk Warning: Trading CFDs and FX is risky. It isn't suitable for everyone and if you are a professional client, you could lose substantially more than your initial investment. You don't own or have rights in the underlying assets. Past performance is no indication of future performance and tax laws are subject to change. The information on this website is general in nature and doesn't take into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances, or needs. You should consider whether you’re part of our target market by reviewing our TMD, and read our PDS and other legal documents to ensure you fully understand the risks before you make any trading decisions. We encourage you to seek independent advice if necessary.

Pepperstone Group Limited is located at Level 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3008, Australia and is licensed and regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

The information on this site and the products and services offered are not intended for distribution to any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

© 2024 Pepperstone Group Limited | ACN 147 055 703 | AFSL No.414530